+members get vbat

[2bias]

(07-24-2015, 01:57 AM)TobiasX Wrote:  I'm just gonna casually re-post this.

(07-23-2015, 12:39 PM)TobiasX-kun Wrote:  in all honesty, guests should automatically have VBat on, and just add a regular/trusted rank, which removes that restriction, and does nothing more.

[Keez⭕⃤]

(08-15-2015, 04:23 PM)TobiasX Wrote:  

(07-24-2015, 01:57 AM)TobiasX Wrote:  I'm just gonna casually re-post this.

(07-23-2015, 12:39 PM)TobiasX-kun Wrote:  in all honesty, guests should automatically have VBat on, and just add a regular/trusted rank, which removes that restriction, and does nothing more.

[Dreadark]

Tobias' idea isn't bad.

Although it would be much easier if +members just had a temporary vbat. Because it feels like +members are almost always on.

[Chosen]

I think +members should at least get a vbat command , but as well as a votegag (This would help because when there isn't a moderator on, most people are mic spamming) and if !vbat (Name) wouldn't work then what about a votevbat command instead. Just some way for there to be a cut on how much mic spam has been going on would be gratefully appreciated.

[NeoLeo]

a Vote Vbat and Vote Gag would be much help in a huge server with no mods on,
just incase normal VBat wouldnt be allowed

[Unpoke]

(08-18-2015, 10:20 PM)Leo The Sexy Kitty Wrote:  a Vote Vbat and Vote Gag would be much help in a huge server with no mods on,
just incase normal VBat wouldnt be allowed

making it vote would be so pointless, 85% of the players hate vbat in general
it'd hardly ever fly.

people complain that its active even when it's desperately needed.

[Enchantable]

i do nothing in this community so
+1

[2bias]

(08-15-2015, 04:29 PM)Dubstepcat Wrote:  

(08-15-2015, 04:23 PM)TobiasX Wrote:  

(07-24-2015, 01:57 AM)TobiasX Wrote:  I'm just gonna casually re-post this.

(07-23-2015, 12:39 PM)TobiasX-kun Wrote:  in all honesty, guests should automatically have VBat on, and just add a regular/trusted rank, which removes that restriction, and does nothing more.

[Chosen]

(08-18-2015, 10:23 PM)Unpoke Wrote:  making it vote would be so pointless, 85% of the players hate vbat in general
it'd hardly ever fly.

people complain that its active even when it's desperately needed.

Ever actually done a vote when people are mic spamming? Most the server would vote Yes for a mass vbat, so I doubt they'd vote No for singular or mass vbat.

[Unpoke]

(08-18-2015, 10:59 PM)NotChosen Wrote:  

(08-18-2015, 10:23 PM)Unpoke Wrote:  making it vote would be so pointless, 85% of the players hate vbat in general
it'd hardly ever fly.

people complain that its active even when it's desperately needed.

Ever actually done a vote when people are mic spamming? Most the server would vote Yes for a mass vbat, so I doubt they'd vote No for singular or mass vbat.

I don't know if I agree with that...
Either way, a serverwide vote just to vbat someone seems a little redundant, don't ya think?
I'unno, maybe there could be another way. Voting between just +Members and above? If there's only one +Member or above there just let it fly?

hoo noes