If you believe a theory meant to cover a huge field can be proven by a few examples then something is wrong. Stop using yourself or others as an example against it and only looking at examples that are against it. LICEBIT he isn't going to be staff, he'd be a member so the slaying factor means NOTHING and you probably represented your community pretty well. Stop being, so narrow minded and only focusing on examples that prove AGAINST it. This is completely unfair 100% unfair to the younger players and the least we can do is remove the age requirement for members because they simply represent the community they hold no power <<<<<<<<<
Edit: I can understand an age requirement under staffing from what LICEBIT said, but instead of saying age requirement it could say suggested age. Therefore, if you believe they are to young you can deny them for it and if they are pretty good you can accept them. Should really be removed for member though.
This is the last time I'll comment on the issue.
Edit: I can understand an age requirement under staffing from what LICEBIT said, but instead of saying age requirement it could say suggested age. Therefore, if you believe they are to young you can deny them for it and if they are pretty good you can accept them. Should really be removed for member though.
This is the last time I'll comment on the issue.
x2
x1