09-09-2016, 02:03 AM
(09-09-2016, 02:01 AM)nice_the_bear Wrote:(09-09-2016, 01:38 AM)tobiasxz Wrote:(09-09-2016, 01:35 AM)nice_the_bear Wrote: so if you know for %100 that someone is a t its rdm now?
are you stupid?
he said when people say something along the lines of "x is a T, but no KOS since i have NO PROOF".
then why would they say "x is a T" if they had no proof? that'd just be blatant false kos
Because they don't have proof, they have suspicion. Is the difference between proof and suspicion really that hard to comprehend?



x1